Back in 2019, I reviewed and awarded considerable praise to W. B. Saffell, a curious new entry in Campari’s Whiskey Barons Collection. Looking back, it seems the series failed to appeal to a majority of whiskey enthusiasts, at least initially. I suppose some of that indifference stemmed from the fact that neither Jimmy nor Eddie Russell were involved with the first two releases, Old Ripy and Bond & Lillard Batch 1. There was also the hefty suggested retail price. At $50 for a 375ml (in 2017) they were a tough sell, and still are for some.
Then came Bond & Lillard Batch 2 and W. B. Saffell, of which Master Distiller Eddie Russell was directly involved in the curation and blending. Truthfully, one could tell, as the profile for Bond & Lillard 2 was a notable step up from its predecessor. As for W. B. Saffell, as stated in my aforementioned review, it “should’ve had a Turkey on it.” Unlike the 2017 expressions, W. B. Saffell surprised fans with layers of depth and complexity – so much so, the price was no longer a source of great concern. In fact, many enthusiasts (myself included) viewed Saffell as a $100 limited edition if purchased as two 375ml bottles. Taking the “limited edition” on the label at its word, I purchased several bottles for future consumption and that was that.
Over the past few years I’ve seen newer bottlings of W. B. Saffell pop up on liquor store shelves and social media – most recently, with a redesigned bottle and label (sans “Batch 1”). Until last month, I felt no push to buy another as I still have bottles from the original release in my cabinet. But then, there’s always that question that lingers in my head … “Is today’s W. B. Saffell the same as yesterday’s W. B. Saffell?” Thanks to the generosity of a friend we’ll soon find out.
Campari Whiskey Barons Collection – W. B. Saffell (2023)
Kentucky Straight Bourbon Whiskey
Proof: 107
Age: Not stated (reportedly a blend of 6-12-year whiskey)
Misc.: Distilled and bottled by The American Medicinal Spirits Co. (produced at the Wild Turkey Distillery), Lawrenceburg, KY
Tasted neat in a Glencairn after a few minutes rest …
Color: rich amber
Nose: caramel, honey, toasted oak, graham cracker, confectioners sugar, hints of orange bitters
Taste: vanilla glaze, butter toffee, peppery oak, cinnamon powder, nutmeg, faint clove
Finish: medium-long w/ diet cream soda, flame-kissed citrus, cedar-esque oak, dry spice, white pepper
Overall: I’ll start by saying this isn’t the W. B. Saffell profile from 2018-2019. If you’re expecting those notes from a current bottling, you might find yourself disappointed. That said, there’s plenty of Wild Turkey character to appreciate – at least with this 2023 iteration. While the original 2018-2019 Saffell has a very “Camp Nelson forward” profile, with darker notes like burnt caramel, molasses, and ginger beer, this 2023 bottling is primarily composed of “core Turkey” notes like vanilla, oak, baking spice, and citrus. It’s definitely a notch above Wild Turkey 101 and Russell’s Reserve 10-Year (excluding LL/ME). Hell, today’s Saffell might even outperform single-barrel expressions like Kentucky Spirit and Russell’s Reserve Single Barrel Bourbon (barrel depending); however, one must consider the price/volume ratio.
Just last week I was in Lawrenceburg, KY for the release of the highly anticipated domestic return of Wild Turkey 101 8-Year. I had a chance to try it, and while I don’t have formal tasting notes on hand to compare, I’m confident enough to state that it’s as good or better than this 2023 W. B. Saffell. With Saffell at $50/375ml and the new 101/8 at $50/750ml, the choice is a no-brainer. Granted, I haven’t tried the 2024-2025 releases of Saffell, but unless those bottlings harken back to the 2018-2019 profile I just don’t see Saffell being worth the investment in 2025. Sure, it sports a cool label and a neat story, but so do countless other whiskeys. If you’re buying to consume, which I’d argue most folks reading this review are, you’re better off with Wild Turkey 101/8.
In closing, 2023’s W. B. Saffell simply doesn’t measure up to the profile that brought it acclaim. It’s undoubtedly good bourbon, and there’s something to be said for that, but at $50 for a 375ml bottle there are much better values in the Wild Turkey catalog. From Rare Breed to Russell’s Reserve private barrel selections, I just can’t think of a reason to purchase W. B. Saffell outside of a novelty or potential collector’s item. If Campari plans to continue this expression, I’d advocate for a price drop. Perhaps if it were $30-$35 it might find a larger audience. As is, I just don’t see it finding mass-market appeal. Alternatively, increasing the quality of whiskey going into the batches is always an option, but then I’d only have to repeat myself by saying, “It should’ve had a Turkey on it.”
dj
Enjoy this blog? Please consider supporting it via Patreon. In return you’ll receive access to exclusive rewards and weekly whiskey content. Thank you! dj


They made more of these? Why? These have been a failure. In my area the 2018-2019 Batch 1 has been sitting on shelves for years. No matter where they place the WB it doesn’t sell. on the shelf or behind the cash register with other 375mls no one wants it. I think most buyers don’t even know it has ties to WT. another store put it on sale for 25% off and it moved a little. WT should drastically lower the price on these or just discontinue it ime.
It wasn’t the best concept, I’ll admit that. That being said, the original Saffell (2018-2019) was stellar and worth every penny. This one is nice, but doesn’t quite measure up to the original. FWIW all Saffell bottlings said “Batch 1” until last year, so it’s hard to say exactly when those you’re referring to were bottled without checking the laser code. Cheers!
Interesting read DJ, I just found out today that there even were multiple bottlings of the “Batch 1” Saffell…after digging out my bottles, two of them have a bottle code from 2022 and one has no bottle code at all…which I suspect is the original Saffell bottle that I bought with a Bond & Lillard Batch 2 when they were first released. I can’t be absolutely sure though, I bought three bottles a couple of years ago and gave one bottle to a buddy…I just don’t know if I gave him one of the newer bottles or the one I already had. I can say that the front label seems to be slightly different on the bottle I have with no code…the lettering is slightly raised and the artwork seems to have more relief, where the labels on the coded bottles have flat lettering and very minor relief in the artwork.
I guess I’m going to have to open the bottle with no code and compare it with the my opened 2022 bottle to find out definitively if they are the same or not. All things considered, I guess it’s a pretty good problem to have!
Thanks Kevin! Comparing is really the only way to know. 2018-2019 have been the best I’ve had so far, though I’ve yet to try a 2022 bottling. If you do end up trying that comparison, please let me know how that fares. Cheers!
If your address is the same, I’ll send a sample…
Very kind of you, but I’m good at the moment. Thanks!
Could you post bottle codes?
It’s very faintly etched. The most I can read is LL/LJ0. The rest is unclear.
For my bottles?
The one has no code, the other two ar LL/KE051324 and LL/KE051326
Thanks!
For my bottles?
The one has no code, the other two ar LL/KE051324 and LL/KE051326
Appreciate it!
Thanks for this article! I just learned this was WT! Need to find the older batches now! Cheers!
Anytime!
Is it only the sticker on the neck that designates Batch 1 vs the newer product?
I just grabbed one from an online retailer at basically MSRP that has the Batch 1 neck sticker but I am a little skeptical that they’d be selling it for that price all these years later.
I’m happy with my first pour tonight either way. Thanks for the review(s) over the years!
All of the batches through 2023 (and possibly early 2024) say “batch 1.” The bottle design changed sometime after 2023. Personally, I recommend seeking out bottles with date codes of 2018-2019.